Living in the Age of Airplanes

A new documentary chronicling the impact of aviation in our lives debuts Friday in theaters around the nation. A National Geographic production, Living in the Age of Airplanes, is directed by Brian Terwilliger and covers 95 locations in 18 countries and seven continents. The full story of the new film can be had by clicking here. Here’s the link to the trailer.

An AvWeb article on the film also touts a film about Above and Beyond, chronicling Jewish-American pilots fighting to establish the independence of Israel after smuggling out planes to join the fight.

Enjoy

PDX Carpet Change Over Becomes Cult Favorite

I’ve always loved Portland and have been aware that its unique carpet — based on its runway configuration — was a hit. It is now changing over its carpet which has become cult favorite and I like both old and new versions. You have to admit that PDX has made the transition into the 21st Century communications when it engenders such strong positive feelings about the experience there. Enjoy!

A fan base for carpet.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/todayinthesky/2015/04/04/fervor-over-portland-oregon-airport-carpet-spurs-new-life/25287489/

U.S. Regional airline restructuring Part I: Is consolidation inevitable – or essential?

38231_147682035246382_3489780_n

I’ve written a two-part analysis of the regional airline industry for Centre for Aviation concluding further consolidation is necessary to survive the yoke of the mainline partners. But it will likely mean further abandonment of cities across America. Enjoy the article and then join the discussion. http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/us-regional-airline-restructuring-part-i-is-consolidation-inevitable–or-essential-217004

Convincing the CFO to Consider Business Aviation

Kathryn B. Creedy --Veteran aviation journalist and communications strategist

Kathryn B. Creedy –Veteran aviation journalist and communications strategist

I recently wrote this column for Screen Shot 2015-03-27 at 1.23.16 PMand thought my Winging It readers would like to see it. There are many marketing opportunities missed by business aviation and small airports that can be exploited to increase business. I just think it takes a little step back to look at the big travel picture. I would love to hear your thoughts. Enjoy — Kathryn

Holiday Guide to Gate-to-Gate Electronic Device Use

Kathryn B. Creedy --Veteran aviation journalist and communications strategist

Kathryn B. Creedy –Veteran aviation journalist

By Kathryn B. Creedy

A year ago airlines tumbled all over themselves to be the first to offer gate-to-gate electronic use, courtesy of the Consumer Electronics Association, which engineered the change. While Delta won the race as first to file a plan, JetBlue was the first to be approved to broaden the gate-to-gate use of personal electronic devices (PEDs). Even so, confusion still reigns and it is little wonder.

As holiday travel builds this year, it is a good time to review some of the rules of the air. For instance, you may not settle into your seat, fire up your laptop and continue working until the ramp agents chock the wheels at the end of the flight. While it may be legal to use some electronics gate to gate, safety concerns still prevail.

“While phones, tablets, and e-readers are allowed at all phases of flight,” JetBlue Spokesperson Morgan Johnston told USA Today, echoing most carriers, “large electronic devices like laptops must be properly stowed before pushback and prior to landing. This is necessary to ensure safe egress of the aircraft in an emergency and is unrelated to the changes in FAA policy.”

When the gate-to-gate announcements began rolling out this time last year, they called for unrestricted use of most PEDs, gate to gate, including phones and tablets. A small PED, according to Southwest Airlines, is an electronic device weighing less than two pounds. Southwest is unique among airlines in the U.S. because it allows gate to gate use of WiFi, according to the airline. Other airlines allow connectivity at 10,000 feet and above although United Spokesperson Luke Punzenberger indicated that it is working with vendors to enable WiFi usage below 10,000 feet. Similarly, Lufthansa is now working with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to allow WiFi gate to gate.

While you may be able to make mobile calls and text while the aircraft is on the ground, cellular use is strictly forbidden once the wheels leave the runway. In fact, the cell functionality must be switched off or put in airplane mode, according to regulations set down by the Federal Communications Commission. The Consumer Electronic Association continues to work on changing this but the debate rages on amongst passengers and in the halls of Congress as to whether or not this should be allowed. For now, surveys reveal flight attendants, passengers and Congress alike are against it both on nuisance and security grounds.

For the most part, however, passengers are freer to use their electronic equipment, such as e-readers, game devices and tablets gate to gate. Indeed, JetBlue recently logged its millionth customer-connected device on its game-changing Fly-Fi system, the first high-speed system for the industry, delivered to JetBlue aircraft as part of its partnership with ViaSat. Alone among competitors Fly-Fi allows the entire passenger complement to log in and surf the net without slowing down because of inadequate bandwidth. JetBlue boasts 40 percent of passengers log on during any given flight. Eye-popping statistics reveal that 66 million megabytes of data have thus far been transferred aboard JetBlue flights. Forty percent of activity is streaming content.

 Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 2.12.06 PM

Source: JetBlue

 A survey of the major mainline and low-cost carriers in the U.S. revealed that while gate to gate usage is widespread, airlines reserve the right to restrict usage in certain circumstances. JetBlue, for instance, will ask passengers to turn off their devices in certain low-visibility landings, according to Johnston, who indicated that affected only about 1% of flights.

Virgin America, on the other hand, has been cleared for PED use during all categories of flight, even during lower visibility precision approaches and landings.

The rules are usually spelled out in the back of the inflight magazines. In general, most airlines allow unlimited usage of tablets, e-readers, smartphones (in airplane mode only) CD and other media players, handheld gaming devices and noise canceling headphones. Laptops and DVD players can be used at the gate and inflight but must be stowed for takeoff and landing (below 10,000 feet). PEDs that are not permitted include personal air purifiers, remote control devices, televisions and two-way radios or transmitters.

While the move to gate-to-gate PED usage is revolutionary there is one aspect of inflight use that remains an Achilles heel and that is the lack of in-seat power ports to keep them charged. The increasing functionality of PEDs drains the power faster. Airlines are busily installing power ports, even in coach but it still remains the exception rather than the rule. For now, passengers better bring along a portable power unit to at least ensure the phone is powered when the plane lands.

Wheels Up Reinvents Air Service While Democratizing Private Aviation

For me, the biggest news out of last week’s National Business Aircraft Association was the upcoming first anniversary on November 1 of Wheels Up, a private aviation company that has single handedly re-invented regional air services. Its most important contribution to the industry, however, is the fact that it has expanded the market for private aviation services by bringing down the entry fee.

Wheels Up_King Air 350i (4)

Mind you, New York City-based Wheels Up is not an airline. But it does deliver air service to hundreds of communities. Airline consolidation, coupled with the recession, eliminated approximately 15 percent of airline capacity, leaving many communities off the scheduled airline map. For these communities, the old admonition “you can’t get there from here” has taken on a new, ominous meaning.

Wheels Up CEO Kenny Dichter is careful to explain that Wheels Up is not even an aviation company. “We are a technology company,” he said at NBAA, “that is trying to substantially change the market.”

President David Baxt agrees. “Private aviation has been a matter of poaching each other’s customers,” he told me. “We are expanding the market, democratizing private aviation, and driving new people to it.”

Wheels Up calls its services revolutionary and I agree. I have been watching the steady decline of the nation’s regional airlines and community air service. Decline, you say? They are 50 percent of all departures. How can they be in decline? They are in decline because they are no longer the masters of their own fate. They have been steadily pressured by their mainline partners and have gone from a respectable eight- to 10-percent return on investment to struggling to find a new model that works under the more restrictive mainline regimes.

A recent conversation with SkyWest CEO Jerry Atkin was illuminating. When asked about the development of a point-to-point scheduled service, he was unenthusiastic. “But,” he said, tellingly, “I am so focused on hub and spoke, I really don’t know.”

After all, it has been tried before. First there was the late Independence Air and then, ExpressJet, which gained respectable traction with its point-to-point service. Express Jet, however, launched its branded service just as fuel prices were rising. It ultimately fell to $145 per-barrel fuel. Still, its success before the fuel increase left me wondering if there were a place for such entrepreneurial creativity with lower fuel prices. Could one be successful returning to the basics – connecting communities of interest? Could one bring back the out-and-back-in-one-day business trip that built the regional airlines?

I know barriers to entry services are high. Regional jets were not designed for fuel that is more than $50 to $60 per barrel. No aircraft is. The age of the current turboprops in regional airline service constitutes another barrier. Such airlines as Kenmore Air, Great Lakes and Cape Air have been forced to develop their own manufacturing operations to keep their Beech 1900s, Cessna 402s, and Twin Otters in operation. There are no new commuter-style turboprops in the offing. Many of the routes using Saab 340s, Embraer Brasilias and ATR 42s had long since dropped off the commercial grid and these aircraft, too, are now old.

New pilot rules – 1,500 hours before being considered for the right seat – created a pilot shortage at regionals so acute that such successful companies as Republic Airways Holdings grounded dozens of aircraft and Great Lakes reduced the 19-seat count of a Beech 1900 to nine to accommodate the different rules that would allow them to hire pilots.

Still, I have faith point-to-point services could be successful, given the growing dissatisfaction with airline service and the fact many lost points were once the bread and butter of the regional industry. Since the dawn of commercial aviation, communities have always changed out airlines as larger airlines dropped service; first, in favor of the local service carriers and, post-deregulation, to regional airlines which were flying Pipers and Beechcraft.

Regional services have taken their turn at abandonment at a time when so much is stacked against the advent of replacement carriers. The big question, however, is whether passengers have been so trained to drive to distant low-fare airports, that they have broken the historical chain. Still, factories and businesses are located off the commercial grid and the price of time is getting dearer as commercial service gets more complex.

Just as I have been observing regional airline changes, I have also been watching the business aviation market and have been puzzled by the lack of efforts to expand the market. Wheels Up has done its part but there is so much more that can be done if the industry would only do it.

There are no fewer than a dozen studies that make the business case for business aviation that will attract more and more passengers to business aviation, yet they are not being used. A glimpse can be seen in just two studies. The growing hassle factor with commercial aviation cost the airlines $38 million in avoided trips and the U.S. economy $85 billion and 900,000 jobs in 2013. Another study indicated that at the top of the last business cycle, when congestion was at its worst, business aviation use rose from 16 percent of all premium business trips to 41%.

We seem to be reaching a perfect storm in business aviation. Consider this: Given the hassle factors, airlines are trying to keep the business/first class passenger with new perks such as gate-to-gate transfers by luxury car, early boarding and posh service once on board. Delta and Lufthansa are both offering business jet services to its elite passengers to get them to the hub. Still, these elites have to run the airport gauntlet. Long walks from the parking lot, security, crowded terminals, trying to weave their way through the gate lice to get to the early boarding and enduring regional jets once they get there. All this reduces the gap between business and commercial aviation.

As I was covering the Wheels Up press conferences, I realized it had invented the next iteration of regional air service one that had little to do with scheduled service but everything to do with turning travel costs into an investment in time. It has created a new business model at a time when business and private aviation can become a viable alternative to commercial aviation if it is smart.

Wheels Up_King Air 350i (2)

Key to this strategy is the acquisition of 105 Beech King Air 350i’s that Baxt termed a little more “politically correct,” perhaps, than the popular misconception of the business jet. It has the economics to fly the mission just as efficiently as, but less expensively, than a business jet. Wheels Up’s operating partner, Gama Aviation, has no problem attracting pilots, having built its pilot corps to 150 in the past year with a 2,500-hour minimum. Gama Aviation CEO Marwan Khalek said at NBAA that introducing 37 aircraft inside a year was akin to starting a commuter airline. He was, in fact, reading my mind.

Launched in August 2013 to disrupt private aviation, Wheels Up took its first flight on November 1. It introduced a membership-based program that makes private aviation far more accessible by reducing the investment needed upfront. Its fleet has expanded from zero to 37 aircraft (27 King Airs and, since June, 10 Citation Excel/XLSs) owing to the unique partnership it forged with Gama, which dry leases, manages, provides line maintenance and is the sole operator of the aircraft. Wheels up handles the sales, marketing, customer service, reservations and concierge services that drive membership. The aircraft are staged at regional hubs across the U.S.

The cost for an individual is $15,750 and $25,000 for a corporate membership, small considering the price of a single business and first class fare. Previously, one would need $50,000 to $100,000 to participate in the private aviation pyramid. Cost per hour for the King Air turboprop is $3,950, which, said the company, on a per-seat basis, could be a very affordable $500 per hour. The Citation Excel goes for $6,950 per hour.

A year later, the company has 750 members and by year’s end expects to surpass the 1,000 mark. It currently schedules 40 flights daily for members and expects that to rise to 50 to 70 flights daily by year’s end.

“The world is a different place compared to when Marquis Jet was founded in 2001,” said Dichter, who led Marquis Jet to cumulative revenues in excess of $4 billion, and another $1 billion in fractional sales, during his tenure. “Customers want the advantages of private aviation but demand the utmost cost benefit, flexibility, simplicity and safety standards. With Wheels Up, we deliver just that.”

Clearly it has struck a chord and it is no surprise. Passengers are ripe for considering other options if business aviation would only market itself properly. Wheels Up may not be the answer to returning scheduled air service to communities but it does do one thing. It gets you from here to there.

Blog: An Attack of Business Aviation is an Attack on the Middle Class

Kathryn B. Creedy --Veteran aviation journalist and communications strategist

Kathryn B. Creedy –Veteran aviation journalist and communications strategist

New thoughts on enhancing the understand of business aviation

By Kathryn B. Creedy

USA Today has delivered yet another attack on business aviation with the publication of Senators spent $1 million on charter flights last year. The article not only misrepresents business flying but is a disservice to the 1.2 million people who build and support these aircraft.

The article criticized senators for using charter flights rather than taking the more time consuming, but cheaper, road trip. While it acknowledged the lack of commercial transportation in these remote localities, it missed the point that time wasted in a car or pinging between small communities via a hub is time lost to constituents that have little access to their representatives.

The article increases my frustration with the industry that has created the valuable No Plane, No Gain (NPNG) campaign but doesn’t do the grass-roots work necessary to educate the public.

Indeed, the industry is its own worst enemy in this respect. On the one hand, its advertising universally depicts a new, posh biz jet on the tarmac next to a luxury car that only serves to support the public misconception and belies the work-horse nature of business aircraft missions. On the other hand, there is the NPNG campaign that has largely preached to the choir and rarely, if ever, emerges from behind a web site at least as far as the general-assignment press is concerned. If it did, we would see much more balanced reporting.

Those advertising images are the public face of the industry, like it or not. They are sexy and provide the fodder for the easy shots aimed at us. But if we were to draw back the curtain on the business of business aviation we have a powerful narrative with many new angles that have yet to be exploited. By using them, we no longer have to be apologists despite the headwinds represented by the current class warfare.

Few recognize that business aviation is the perfect nexus between Wall Street and Main Street. Main Street, after all, is where those aircraft are made.

It is ironic that we, as a nation, bemoan the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs while criticizing an industry that has clung so stubbornly to their U.S roots in Wichita, KS, Savannah, GA and Vero Beach, FL. Add to that the new in-sourcing of jobs by Embraer in Melbourne, FL, and HondaJet in Greensboro, NC, and the view from Main Street becomes pretty powerful. Again, add the employees of Honeywell, Rockwell Collins, United Technologies, General Electric and Garmin and you have the real face of business aviation. From this we see that Beech, Cessna, Bombardier, Gulfstream, Embraer, Honda and Piper as well as their supporting manufacturers, still view the U.S. as worthy of continued investment. It is, after all, the epicenter of aviation manufacturing – an industry that is the envy of the world.

It is also ironic that employees are so lost in the debate and relegated to a single, sterile statistic. It is their high-value, middle class, manufacturing jobs that make the industry such a success.

But focusing on hard-working, middle-class Americans is not enough in helping the public understand business aviation. Just as a new route must earn its way onto an airline map, so, too, must business aircraft earn their way on to the balance sheet. Thankfully, the most important contribution NPNG made was a series of studies that proved these are not just jet setter toys but real business tools. Unfortunately, little has been done with these studies except to post them on the web hidden away along with industry employees.

These studies reveal how business aviation contributes to the success of users. Indeed, business aircraft are good for the bottom line, according to studies that conclude:

  • Business aircraft users amongst the S&P 500 companies outperformed non users. Similarly, Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) users bested non users on key metrics. This resulted from having better access to customers and markets not conveniently accessed by other transport modes.
  • Users posted an average annual earnings growth of 434% between 2003 and 2009 over non users
  • Business aviation users recovered faster from the recession than non users
  • Users also began hiring sooner than non users
  • These same companies are leading the nation’s economic growth both in profits and jobs
  • SME users were less impacted by the great recession and 69% posted greater top line growth in 2008 and 2009
  • In 2011, users represented 84% by number and accounted for 96% of total revenue of S&P 500 companies.
  • 74% of the companies added to the S&P 500 group were business aviation users while a significant number of those than dropped out of the group did not use business aviation.
  • The top most innovative and best customer service companies use business aviation

The problem is no one is using this material. Indeed, when I discuss these statistics with business aviation colleagues, they say they are unaware of them. Where is the steady drumbeat of mission specific information? Such information as:

  • 85% of business aircraft missions are middle level customer service and sales representatives serving their customers and building jobs
  • These passengers are flying to remote locations or accomplishing multi-leg trips impossible by commercial transport.
  • These trips are the lifeline of many communities that are trying so hard to maintain what jobs they have.

Yes, yes, I know, now I’m preaching to the choir. And yes, I know, its all there on the website but is anyone really using it? Or is it just there and you think someone else will do it? Or is it the fact that you are too busy or you don’t have the staff or resources to devote to the cause? Perhaps you think that skeptics will chalk it all up to hype from industry-funded studies?

But 1.2 million employees deserve better than that. We are now at a unique crossroads that make the role of business aviation even more important given the dramatic loss of community air service. Couple that with the growing hassle factor of commercial aviation and you have an incredible narrative to increase business.

The time is ripe for our story and every business aviation company must become an ambassador for the industry. What it will take is the old-fashioned, pro-active shoe leather that has proved so successful in the past. The question now is, will the industry make the effort? Sadly, the busy-ness of their lives make it highly doubtful.

But for me, it is my dream job and I know exactly how to do it.

Keywords: Aviation, business, aircraft, flights, charter, business aviation, general aviation, airlines